Named local schemes and plans, with the responsible body and the latest stage established by the source checked. A proposal, funding announcement and completed project are different things.
Water Lane, Exeter
Liveable Water Lane
The design guide sets expectations for streets, buildings and public spaces as industrial land becomes a new neighbourhood.
Design guide adopted; individual schemes need their own decisions · source does not state a status date
Responsible body: Exeter City Council
Latest evidence: The council confirms adoption in 2024 after consultation. The document guides planning applications for the Water Lane redevelopment area; it is not evidence that the whole neighbourhood is under construction.
Next thing to establish: What dated decision or progress report confirms the current stage?
Progress, funding and source
- Cost
- Not established by the evidence checked.
- Funding
- Not established by the evidence checked.
- Area covered
- Unmapped: a verified current ward boundary or council ward statement is still needed.
No verified ward footprint is assigned.
Liveable Water Lane supplementary planning document (2024) →
Source checked 2026-10-17. A plan or announcement is not proof of completion.
Questions for the next progress report
- What is the approved cost, including ongoing maintenance?
- Which funding is committed, and what remains conditional?
- Which neighbourhoods are covered by an official project plan, and which benefits still need testing?
- What is the next published milestone, and what evidence will show residents benefit?
Make room for homes people can afford →
Target support where disadvantages overlap →
How to track delivery →Wonford Community and Leisure Centre
Wonford Community Wellbeing Hub
The ageing community and leisure centre would be renewed, with spaces for local groups, activity and access to Ludwell Valley Park.
Council approved recommendations; next delivery steps required · evidence dated 2026-03-24
Responsible body: Exeter City Council and community partners
Latest evidence: The decision record confirms approval on 24 March. It identifies further design, procurement and business-case work, matched-funding requirements and a summer 2028 delivery condition. It does not confirm a building contract.
Next thing to establish: What is the approved cost, including ongoing maintenance?
Progress, funding and source
- Cost
- Not established by the evidence checked.
- Funding
- Not established by the evidence checked.
- Area covered
- Unmapped: a verified current ward boundary or council ward statement is still needed.
No verified ward footprint is assigned.
Decision: Wonford Community Wellbeing Hub →
Source checked 2026-10-17. A plan or announcement is not proof of completion.
Questions for the next progress report
- Which funding is committed, and what remains conditional?
- Which neighbourhoods are covered by an official project plan, and which benefits still need testing?
- What is the next published milestone, and what evidence will show residents benefit?
Keep Wonford’s next steps tied to a workable delivery plan →
Plan homes and care around an older population →
Bring support closer to people in poor health →
Target support where disadvantages overlap →
How to track delivery →Vaughan Road, Whipton
Vaughan Road council homes
The first phase provided 35 homes in September 2025. A further 16 were planned for the next phase, with completion then expected in late 2027.
First phase complete; later phase timetable reported in May 2026 · evidence dated 2026-06-22
Responsible body: Exeter City Council
Latest evidence: The May progress table records Phase A complete in September 2025 with 35 one- and two-bedroom homes. Phase B was due to start in July 2026 and finish in late 2027 with 16 homes. Passing the planned start date does not confirm work began.
Next thing to establish: What is the approved cost, including ongoing maintenance?
Progress, funding and source
- Cost
- Not established by the evidence checked.
- Funding
- Not established by the evidence checked.
- Area covered
- Unmapped: the named sites or programme area have not been matched to the ward boundaries used by these statistics. No ward-wide effect is inferred.
No verified ward footprint is assigned.
Executive papers, 22 June 2026: May progress report, page 113 →
Source checked 2026-10-17. A plan or announcement is not proof of completion.
Questions for the next progress report
- Which funding is committed, and what remains conditional?
- Which neighbourhoods are covered by an official project plan, and which benefits still need testing?
- What is the next published milestone, and what evidence will show residents benefit?
Turn Vaughan Road’s next phase into homes people can use →
Make room for homes people can afford →
Target support where disadvantages overlap →
How to track delivery →What this local evidence covers
13 of 13 wards
Have at least one valid census comparison with the whole council. Missing measures stay visible.
Read the neighbourhood evidence →4 reviewed plans and projects
3 have a source-dated stage; 0 have some funding evidence; 0 have some cost evidence. These counts do not prove that funding or costs are complete.
Check each project →0 verified ward links
Project locations cannot be treated as a map of who benefits. Each record explains any verified ward association.
Read the sources and limits →What is still missing
The reviewed local schemes are a selected evidence collection, not a complete council capital programme.
Current service capacity, incomes, waiting lists, school demand and project outcomes need additional verified local evidence before firm claims can be made.
The Water Lane design guide does not establish construction or funding for every site. Wonford still requires procurement, an agreed business case and planning amendments.
Project locations have not yet been checked against current ward boundaries. No ward impact is inferred from a city-centre address.
Vaughan Road’s July 2026 start and late-2027 completion were forward dates in a May report; an updated site return is still needed.
The safety-team update does not establish full citywide deployment or a causal reduction in recorded incidents.
