Skip to content
ExeterCountsExeter, in numbers.Local help →

Exeter · England

Issues

Exeter council area. Every figure carries its own date.

Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats drawn from the available evidence. These are analytical judgements, not an official council assessment. Where a national comparison is available, lower housing costs, lower reported poor health and higher qualification shares are treated as relative strengths; this does not prove affordability or service quality.

Strengths

strength

Make room for homes people can afford

Average private rent is £1,318 a month (August 2026) in Exeter council area. This is £141 lower than the England average for the same month. Homes rented privately ranged from 10.4% in Pinhoe to 46.6% in Duryard and St James — a gap of 36.2 percentage points.

Housing costs matter most alongside earnings and the number of affordable homes available. A local average cannot tell us whether a particular household can afford its home.

What could help →

strength

Bring support closer to people in poor health

4.6% of people reported bad or very bad health in Exeter council area (21 March 2021). Across England, the figure was 5.2%. People reporting bad or very bad health ranged from 2.8% in Duryard and St James to 6.4% in Mincinglake and Whipton — a gap of 3.6 percentage points.

This is how residents described their health in the census. It can reveal differences between neighbourhoods, but does not diagnose illness or measure current waiting times. Age profiles differ between places, so these shares do not measure service quality.

What could help →

strength

Connect local skills to local opportunities

34.7% of people aged 16 or over had a degree or equivalent (21 March 2021) in Exeter council area. Across England, the figure was 33.9%. People aged 16+ with no qualifications ranged from 5% in Duryard and St James to 22.1% in Priory — a gap of 17.1 percentage points.

Qualifications show one part of the skills available locally. They do not show whether people have secure jobs or work that uses those skills.

What could help →

Weaknesses

The evidence gathered here does not yet support a distinct finding in this category.

Opportunities

opportunity

Keep Wonford’s next steps tied to a workable delivery plan

Wonford Community Wellbeing Hub has an approved next-stage decision, with design, procurement, business-case and matched-funding work still required.

Proposed response: Resolve those dependencies before presenting the renewed hub as a contracted building project.

What could help →

opportunity

Turn Vaughan Road’s next phase into homes people can use

Exeter has completed the first Vaughan Road phase but the checked evidence gives only a timetable for the next one.

Proposed response: Confirm the next phase’s actual start and funding before treating its planned homes as delivery.

Evidence

What could help →

opportunity

Show where the expanded safety service makes a difference

The safety-team expansion has been approved, but the checked update is about staffing and training rather than outcomes.

Proposed response: Publish coverage and response measures so residents can see what the service does.

Evidence

What could help →

opportunity

Plan homes and care around an older population

16.6% of people in Exeter council area were aged 65 or over (21 March 2021). People aged 65 or over ranged from 9% in Duryard and St James to 23.6% in Alphington — a gap of 14.6 percentage points.

Age alone does not mean poor health or a need for care. Accessible homes, reliable transport and support close to home matter as people get older.

What could help →

opportunity

Target safety work where problems repeat

Mapped police records are available for neighbourhoods in Exeter council area.

Published locations are approximate and some crimes are not mapped. Counts show recorded incidents, not the chance of an individual becoming a victim.

What could help →

opportunity

Turn published plans into visible progress

4 named local projects or plans have official evidence in this collection.

A published plan makes responsibilities and intentions easier to inspect. It does not prove that funding is secured or that promised benefits have arrived.

What could help →

opportunity

Target support where disadvantages overlap

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages ranged from 13.3% in Duryard and St James to 23.8% in Mincinglake and Whipton — a gap of 10.6 percentage points.

These households met at least two census conditions covering education, employment, health and housing. This is not an income or poverty measure.

What could help →

Threats

The evidence gathered here does not yet support a distinct finding in this category.

Which response goes with each issue?